• The Forums are now open to new registrations, adverts are also being de-tuned.

Bought an R129 unseen - a Cautionary Tale...

Considering you don't have the log book and the seller is providing a story of no longer trade but private, coupled with the "little bird" police story. What makes you think he even owned it to start with?

It's not beyond the realms of possibility you are now in possession of a stolen vehicle, never mind the suggestion you have TWOC hanging over you.

This has shambles written all over it.

Too whom did you pay the deposit? A private individual or a business?

That's a good point and If it were me I'd find out if it has a stolen marker on it as that obviously decides your next course of action
 
Naturally, you are very frustrated after the experience you had in Bradford and the condition of the car. However, you need to appreciate how you have behaved in this transaction. You have agreed to buy the car at a negotiated price. You paid 60% deposit, and then have taken ~4 months to arrange to pick up the car.

During this time, the seller is effectively left with a car unsold, and only your word that you will complete the transaction along with the possession of your deposit. You can see how they would feel equally messed about.

That doesn't condone his behaviour and the condition of the car when you arrived, but you have to concede that you are not fault free either.

The problem you have now is how to resolve a situation where neither of you trust each other. You both need to agree a fair price, You need a receipt and the V5 transferred.

If you don't agree a price, and most likely one over your 60% deposit, it is unlikely you'll ever get a receipt and the V5 transferred. Leaving you open to more issues, hassle, time and legal costs.

So to resolve this, it's most likely you are going to have to pay more and meet in person again as neither of you have much trust in the other completing the transaction. You are not going to hand over anymore cash until you get the receipt and docs and he's not going to send these without getting the cash.

cheers, Steve
 
Two things I would do here.

1) Establish who the legal owner is straight away and if it's not chummy chops who you are dealing with contact them asap before they cite you for theft!

2) If you get that sorted get an independent expert valuation based on the state of the car listing the faults and offer that as the price citing false advertising as the reason for the price change!
 
Sorry if you have already said, but have you got a receipt for the 60% deposit??
 
Why did you pay a 60% deposit?

How much was the car?

What is the seller saying now you have taken his car & you haven't paid him?
 
Agreed to buy the car at a negotiated price. You paid 60% deposit, and then have taken ~4 months to arrange to pick up the car./QUOTE]

The seller agreed to keep the car for me - hence the hefty deposit - and most of the further delay was due to his inaction.
 
What's actually wrong with it?

Is it worth the 60% in its present state?
 
1) Establish who the legal owner is straight away.

2) If you get that sorted get an independent expert valuation based on the state of the car listing the faults and offer that as the price citing false advertising as the reason for the price change!

1) Letter has gone to DVSA seeking this information.

2) See my other thread " R129 SL500 - Valuation Anybody?" That's good enough for me; we're not talking about a rare and valuable classic.
 
Why did you pay a 60% deposit?

How much was the car?

What is the seller saying now you have taken his car & you haven't paid him?

Read the thread. All will be revealed in due course.
 
Last edited:
What's actually wrong with it?

Is it worth the 60% in its present state?

Nothing major, I think, and yes, probably. That is a qualified yes, though, depending on the state of the hood, which I won't know until Sunday. If the hood's knackered, it's only worth project money - about £2K, Jaymanek reckons.

All will be revealed in due course.
 
Why did you pay a 60% deposit?

How much was the car?

What is the seller saying now you have taken his car & you haven't paid him?

Assuming in the first place that the seller was entitled to be selling the car , payment of the 60% deposit means that the OP has a greater share in the car than the seller , and possibly more than a 60% share if the price is negotiated downwards .

Since the seller met the OP for the purpose of allowing collection ( before he absconded ) I think the OP was perfectly reasonable in uplifting the car he had the majority shareholding in , whilst making every effort to contact the seller .

Since he is now making every effort to finalise the deal , and has been in dialogue with the seller , I see little wrongdoing .

It does sound as though the vehicle was originally advertised by a business , and the deposit paid to them . If the business has now ceased trading , it might be worth trying to trace the administrator to clarify the situation . I'd also take the view , that having paid the bulk of the asking price ( before true condition of car was disclosed , therefore to be revised downwards - UNLESS Op signed a contract agreeing to buy at that price ) the op is looking to either complete the transaction or get his deposit back , against which he is holding the car as a surety . It seems a reasonable assumption that the business at least , if not this private person , did have the right to be selling the car .

If it turns out that a third party owns the car , the worst case scenario is that the OP may have to return it . As a bona fide buyer , he has little to fear : the seller would be the one and only person facing fraud charges , unless it were proven the OP was complicit in the fraud , which I don't read out of this account .

Someone who buys a dodgy car in good faith normally has nothing more than losing the car , and any money he has paid , to fear - the OP has already stated he can stand this if it comes to it .
 
Assuming in the first place that the seller was entitled to be selling the car , payment of the 60% deposit means that the OP has a greater share in the car than the seller , and possibly more than a 60% share if the price is negotiated downwards .

I don't think it works like that.

You can't just load up someone else's car without their consent.

That said seller seems keen enough to resolve.
 
Nothing major, I think, and yes, probably. That is a qualified yes, though, depending on the state of the hood, which I won't know until Sunday. If the hood's knackered, it's only worth project money - about £2K, Jaymanek reckons.

All will be revealed in due course.

If the hood itself is in poor condition you can pick up serviceable used ones in the low hundreds ( Carl at R129.co.uk advertises them regularly ) ; if the electro hydraulic mechanism isn't working that is a bigger problem , but not insurmountable , again used parts available from the same source .
 
I don't think it works like that.

You can't just load up someone else's car without their consent.

That said seller seems keen enough to resolve.

But he did have consent : the seller met him to allow collection ! And , with some assumptions as above , having paid most of it it was largely HIS car to take .
 
But he did have consent : the seller met him to allow collection ! And , with some assumptions as above , having paid most of it it was largely HIS car to take .

You have to pay all of the agreed price of something before you can take it away.
 
Tread warily.

If you have only paid the (substantial) deposit and then removed the car without completing the transaction then I would think that you 'might' be found to have taken the vehicle without due consent.

Just my 2p worth ...........

I'm pretty sure the seller agreed a vastly lower price because of all the problems. :dk:
 
You have to pay all of the agreed price of something before you can take it away.

Depends on the terms of the sale .
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom