I am just waiting for the new one to come out , 400 bhp from a 2.5 motor !!!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I know the TTS is a quick car the newRS will be ridiculous!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am just waiting for the new one to come out , 400 bhp from a 2.5 motor !!!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stevebgt1 said:Stuart , i may have mentioned this before but i used to have the TtRs Plus ., For thirty odd grand ( used low mileage etc ) you get go kart handling , 0-60 in sub 4 seconds and a top end of 179 mph . Not to mention fabulous brakes and adjustable suspension . Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stevebgt1 said:You obviously never been in one then . Seats adjust to anyone up to about 6'2" . If you are taller than that then you are probably heavy too , so get a Range Rover . Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
MC63CLK said:here we go again Audi owners for you Yes though Switzerland this summer great cars but they don't float my barge just giving my honest opinion. How's the house coming on?
here we go again Audi owners for you
Yes though Switzerland this summer great cars but they don't float my barge just giving my honest opinion.
How's the house coming on?
Zzzzzzzzz!
Mercedes have a 2l with that already!lol
Is it me, or that C63 owners dare not talk about the vastly superior and much faster E63's.
lol.
No-one mentioned the vastly better handling (and even more power too..) E63-S :bannana:
And as for performance mod's on the 5.5 B-Turbo, getting almost 700bhp for very little money?
And if you start about saying "E" class is an "old mans" car, then think how you are all comparing C63's to M-Classes and what they says about you![]()
Funny you should mention this.
Whilst I owned my C63 it felt special, mainly because I had a 507 and that's not being snobby, its just a fact. And as much as I appreciate the whole C63 AMG Thang, I felt that the longer I had mine, the more there were out there, coming onto the market, at the end of their lease periods, for very good money. Now that's a good thing when enthusiasts want to buy into that market, BUT...and its a big BUT....it also attracts the wrong kind of clientele too.........
Now I have got out of mine, and I stand here now looking in, I really appreciate the E63.....and ....I am only 48 years old !
Is it a superior car to the C63 ??.......I,ll let you decide....![]()
err.... only 379 hp and a crap soundtrack .....
How does the M5 fair up against the C63 (apart from the noise?), this was second on my list behind the M4 to buy, although i could get one a lot quicker, plus it has 4 doors so a tad more practical!
Mine is the most recent RS4 . And it would leave any C63 for dead in the real world . While your messing about getting sideways coming out of corners shredding your rear tyres , i just catapult off the apex with shed loads of grip and grin widely as i subconsciously say bye bye to you in my rear view mirror ! Lol !
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Don't want a slanging match on here.
The C63 is more than adequate at keeping the RS4 down, even on corners if you can drive. My mapped A45 was also quicker than the RS4. The RS4 is a nice car, don't get me wrong. But, performance wise it's lacking.
See the B8 RS4 here, vs a 525bhp M3 at 6m 10s left for dead. Even a stock C63, with no PPP is quicker than the RS4.
My C63 is at 8m. Map only
[URL]https://youtu.be/GxCKwgYUSCE[/URL]
Its true though the RS4 just isn't that quick.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.