Hmm... clearly Lewis was about as happy as Valterri. There's a bean counter somewhere that is over the moon.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I guess very few people will ever know the answer to that!.....other than tax officials and those directly concerned.Would I be correct in thinking VB would be awarded the winner's bonus?
Something DC alluded to happening in his day?
I remember earlier in the season when VB was given back the place and everyone was questioning whether or not Mercedes would rue that decision as the season came to a close, and on this occasion I tend to agree with DC that Toto did his job and made the right management decision in the circumstances.As Wolff says (somewhat sheepishly), "I would prefer to be a baddie tonight than an idiot at the end of the season"
A fair summation of the situation.
I remember earlier in the season when VB was given back the place and everyone was questioning whether or not Mercedes would rue that decision as the season came to a close, and on this occasion I tend to agree with DC that Toto did his job and made the right management decision in the circumstances.
Mercedes have (justifiably) earned a reputation for letting their drivers race - unlike a certain other long-standing team - which makes yesterday's decision look worse than it was. Had it been Kimi ordered to give up a place for SV, nobody would have batted an eyelid.
I assuage my sympathy for Bottas with the thought he is getting paid £7 million per annum to come second.
If they had let them race chances are Hamilton would have caught him by the end of the race and they might have taken each other out [ there is history!] leaving Vettel with a clear 25 points thus halving Lewis' lead at a stroke. Factor in another DNF for Hamilton and its all to play for again. Hamilton "won" the race because he had already won quite a few GP's this year where no team orders were employed.
Not good for racing fans but tactically a sound move by the Mercedes Team.
Such punters should get out to the Opera more often where they would learn the Wagnerian maxim "it aint over till the fat lady sings"I wonder if people that had a flutter on Valterri for the win will get their money back? Shouldn't be possible to place a bet on an individual's result if the teams are going to effectively contrive the outcome.
I wonder if people that had a flutter on Valterri for the win will get their money back? Shouldn't be possible to place a bet on an individual's result if the teams are going to effectively contrive the outcome.
I wonder if people that had a flutter on Valterri for the win will get their money back? Shouldn't be possible to place a bet on an individual's result if the teams are going to effectively contrive the outcome.
Indeed, and I didn't suggest team orders were or should be illegal. Anyone betting on the 'B' driver to win should (in addition to having their head read) should at least be offered the corresponding odds by the bookie.Team orders are legal. So punter has no recourse if the team switch drivers to get the result that the team wants.
The odds on VB winning should lengthen considerably to reflect this additional factor if the punters and the bookmakers are taking this into account.
Indeed, and I didn't suggest team orders were or should be illegal. Anyone betting on the 'B' driver to win should (in addition to having their head read) should at least be offered the corresponding odds by the bookie.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.