- Joined
- Jan 21, 2005
- Messages
- 28,739
- Location
- Mittel England
- Car
- Smart ForFour AMG Black Series Night Edition Premium Plus 125 Powered by Brabus
That’s very useful, thank you for sharing.That's an astonishing amount of energy for what is essentially losses on a hot water system with no hot water being used.
I too had a circulating system for hot water although mine worked on thermo syphon that I designed myself rather than being pumped. It still managed to lose approx. 6 kw per day so I've turned it off. We now run taps close to the cylinder without circulation and heat water locally at the furthest tap which is 68ft of pipe work away from the cylinder.
Professionally I have worked with large pumped hot water systems with many dozens of outlets in large laboratory buildings and the losses are colossal. I came to the conclusion that heating water locally with under sink electric heaters was far more cost effective and this was 25 years ago when energy was cheap. That it also resolved concerns about legionella sealed the deal particularly for showers. There will still be losses if you heat locally but nothing like 81kWh a day for a domestic property.
I have no idea how much pipe is between the cylinder and the tap, but the cylinder is close to the centre of the house, so the furthest taps are probably 40ft away horizontally and 20ft vertically so I suspect it will be similar to yours as I doubt the pipes take a direct route. However there are 5 hot water taps at that distance from the cylinder, which may not help.
I will turn the pump off and see if it makes a difference. Bizarrely I’ve only just paid “too much” to have that circulation pump replaced as the originally was very noisy. Perhaps the last people who lived here didn’t use it because it was so expensive to use, and a few years of not being used didn’t do it much good.