Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anything published in the Evening Standard also needs to be taken with a pinch of salt.
Re. the 20mph limits, it may be worth considering a lot of Lewisham is made up of residential streets with parking on both sides, people tend to bomb around near me at 40mph+ in similar circumstances - not very safe.
.
Hence I no longer vote and though I sympathise re emigrating ( I'd probably if I were younger ) the grass is'nt necessarily greener on the other side if you don't mind living in a police state worse than here and willing to have id card on your person all the time or face a fine.
There must be somewhere that is willing to accept a hard working, law abiding, intelligent!?! (well with 2 degrees - I like to kid myself!) 35 year old with a bit of entrepreneurial flair?
... from 20MPH to 10MPH.... then 5MPH... then what? Where does it all stop?
Stops at 0 MPH, 'cos you're not moving then
We have grown complacent in our prosperity..
You are discounting going backwards
Ade
America.australia.new zealand.all of asia.eastern europe...all these countries have more get up and go than us.
We have grown complacent in our prosperity..take it from me who has travelled alot with business all over the show the UK is still pretty damn hard to beat..the countries I have listed above will reward hard work but boy you will find it difficult to just walk into a good job unless you have the skills missing in those countries at present. If thats the case then you will need to carve out a niche for yourself and thats hard to do. think how we react in this country to people who come here to mprove their life!
Much as we have bemoaned our rubbish politicians you should see/read/experience some of the things that go on in other places.
That has merit, maybe we should reverse everywhere
Press Release
Statement on Porsche challenge to CO2 charge
19-2-2008 112
A spokesperson for the Mayor of London said: "Porsche's threatened legal action is a double attack on Londoners. First Porsche are trying to deprive Londoners of their democratic right to decide in the Mayoral election on 1 May whether they want gas guzzling and polluting cars to drive in London when there is absolutely no need for them to do so. Second they are trying to impose on all Londoners unnecessary levels of pollution and greenhouse gases by a tiny minority. No one is allowed to throw their rubbish in the street and Porsche should not be allowed to impose gas guzzling polluting cars on Londoners who do not want them."
I'm sure if you asked the average person if they thought a Zafira was a gas-guzzler they'd tell you it's not. This statement only works because Porsche makes cars that the average person believes is out of their reach and as such those with them should be punished for owning.Press Release
Statement on Vauxhall challenge to CO2 charge
19-2-2008 112
A spokesperson for the Mayor of London said: "Vauxhall's threatened legal action is a double attack on Londoners. First Vauxhall are trying to deprive Londoners of their democratic right to decide in the Mayoral election on 1 May whether they want gas guzzling and polluting cars to drive in London when there is absolutely no need for them to do so. Second they are trying to impose on all Londoners unnecessary levels of pollution and greenhouse gases by a tiny minority. No one is allowed to throw their rubbish in the street and Vauxhall should not be allowed to impose gas guzzling polluting cars on Londoners who do not want them."
That's what's so irritating about Ken Livingstone, he openly uses tactics such as abuse, scorn, sarcasm and blatent lies to further his political ends. We have a pretty shabby bunch for our political leaders in this country, but he is in another league.
This is a wonderful example of weasel words. There is a clear implication that some sort of referendum has taken place and the citizens of London have voted by clear majority in favour of this charge. I must have missed it...
That's what's so irritating about Ken Livingstone, he openly uses tactics such as abuse, scorn, sarcasm and blatent lies to further his political ends. We have a pretty shabby bunch for our political leaders in this country, but he is in another league.
But they are out of reach to the average person. I think the statement works the same, whatever manufacturer is referred to. It is Porsche who started this, and Porsche who are being responded to. That's the only reason that Porsche are mentioned. I'm sure that if it were Vauxhall who had threatened to take action, then the GLA's response would be the same. Circumnavigating the weasel words, I think what they are objecting to is a foreign company interfering with the business of an elected body. They have expressed it very badly, I agree. The use of emotive terms such as 'Chelsea Tractor' and 'Gas Guzzler' does nothing to the credibility of their argument, any more than 'Tree-Hugger' or 'Greenie' does to the opposition.This statement only works because Porsche makes cars that the average person believes is out of their reach
It's more than envy, it's actually something that has been brewing in the UK for a long time: as a nation we hate people that succeed. If someone has done well for themselves then they are hated for it.
.
Red Ken was elected by the people of London whom I think, were too young to remember his antics at the GLC ( and why that other dictator Thacher disbanded it) and who unfortunately have got their just desserts for re-electing him.
A bit like Thatcher and Blair he talks a good talk and they've all hoodwinked the lot of us over the years.
Hence I no longer vote and though I sympathise re emigrating ( I'd probably if I were younger ) the grass is'nt necessarily greener on the other side if you don't mind living in a police state worse than here and willing to have id card on your person all the time or face a fine.
It is this wording that annoys me:I think what they are objecting to is a foreign company interfering with the business of an elected body. They have expressed it very badly, I agree. The use of emotive terms such as 'Chelsea Tractor' and 'Gas Guzzler' does nothing to the credibility of their argument, any more than 'Tree-Hugger' or 'Greenie' does to the opposition.
IMPOSE? I did not realise that porsche were forcing their cars on Londoners! I was under the impression that people had a choice of car in this country. It is the customers/drivers that are imposing their cars on Londoners.Porsche should not be allowed to impose gas guzzling polluting cars on Londoners who do not want them.
I'm sure if you asked the average person if they thought a Zafira was a gas-guzzler they'd tell you it's not. This statement only works because Porsche makes cars that the average person believes is out of their reach and as such those with them should be punished for owning.
Ok then smartypants what if it were a tax based on ugliness?!And they would be right - 5 Zafiras have CO2 emissions in excess of 225g, out of a range of 69. Vx have sold less than 500 of these in the past year. Not exactly the average family model.
The best selling model emits between 159g and 165g.
Porsche have 2 models that emit less than 225g - Cayman and Boxster 2.7 manuals. Of course, Porsche are taking this action out of the kindness of their hearts and consideration of all car users, are they not?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.