- Joined
- Dec 29, 2013
- Messages
- 6,277
- Location
- Kidderminster Worcestershire UK
- Car
- Mercedes W124 260E M103
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks.A clue here from my local paper?
''UK Government ‘trying to poach’ ambulance drivers to fill HGV roles
PREMIUM CONTENT
An ambulance driver has criticised the UK Government over letters sent to thousands of staff encouraging them to take roles on heavy goods vehicles.''
Robbing Peter to pay Paul is the expression we're looking for I suspect....Thanks.
Clearly there is a surfeit of ambulance drivers that we are not aware of...............![]()
I can't read the article as I don't want to register, but I assume that the complaining "ambulance driver" also has an HGV licence?An ambulance driver has criticised the UK Government over letters sent to thousands of staff encouraging them to take roles on heavy goods vehicles.
I can't read the whole piece either.I can't read the article as I don't want to register, but I assume that the complaining "ambulance driver" also has an HGV licence?
Fair point re contacting all HGV licence holders but that ''thousands of'' ambulance drivers have been approached and the implications of them all leaving their current jobs is so significant that it casts doubts on the competence of the scattergun approach when to solve one problem without creating another requires a more targeted strategy. Could the government not have first checked the employment status before issuing the letters to ambulance drivers? And, if contacting all HGV licence holders is what is occurring (not only retired drivers as was initially suggested) then the same scenario of drivers leaving one necessary driving job for another remains - aka poaching.If so then I understand that all HGV licence holders have been sent a letter asking them to consider taking an HGV-driving job - even if they're currently employed in that role. If that's the case then their current occupation hasn't been considered so why shouldn't an ambulance driver holding an HGV licence be contacted?
I'm told that the fuel distribution network is prepared for all contingencies and that ''Only an idjit would think that an industry capable of distributing a billion litres a week would be disrupted by a spot of panic buying.'' But I possibly read that too fast and failed to understand it.
A chain with a missing link is worthless.Well the retail part was disrupted. Presumably refining and delivery just went on as normal. Maybe some opportunties for overtime and increased margins in some parts of supply chain.
You forget the distraction from the rocketing price of gas - as winter approaches..... Skirmishes on the forecourts a temporary blip ahead of what could be a difficult winter for many.And most of the public went on as normal.
The media had a whole pile of fun with it.
And the public get to whinge.
And foreign media gets to dis the UK.
mbclub gets a 21+ page topic.
Seriously .... what's not to like .... apart from the few who were seriously inconvenienced .... and the Labour conference which was eclipsed by the 'crisis'?
A chain with a missing link is worthless.
Surely you are not poaching but this is free market. You’ve got a skill (licence) would you like use it? Or maybe it’s a retraining opportunity (good luck with the DVSA certifying you anytime soon) but irrespective they don’t have to accept or act on any request. It’s like whining about the WBAC offer on your car - you don’t have to accept or do anything.I can't read the article as I don't want to register, but I assume that the complaining "ambulance driver" also has an HGV licence?
If so then I understand that all HGV licence holders have been sent a letter asking them to consider taking an HGV-driving job - even if they're currently employed in that role. If that's the case then their current occupation hasn't been considered so why shouldn't an ambulance driver holding an HGV licence be contacted?
I'm not sure - could there be a privacy angle to that? I really don't know.Could the government not have first checked the employment status before issuing the letters to ambulance drivers?
Could the government not have first checked the employment status before issuing the letters to ambulance drivers?
How many will - come out of retirement to go back to school and drive until the panic is over then be told they are no longer required?Any driver with an HGV I licence can take a course of training as a tanker driver, but that's not my point.
That, probably is the biggest story here. Reconfirmation that that is how the public behaves. That is the demand scenario for the distribution network to deal with. It's obvious that panic buying by enough deprives those who subsequently need and that that pattern cannot be changed. Deal with it.The fuel 'crisis' - also largely a construct of the media - leading sheep to panic en masse, will pass, indeed is passing. It is worst in the South-East because the population density, and therefore the sheep density (not necessarily in every sense of the word), is highest here.
Limited shelf life from the retired brought back. New recruits would be better - and this has been obvious for the past decade or more. Get middle management the **** out of the cab and let HGV driving (hard as it is) be a career worth embarking on. Back to what it was. Not cooped up micro-managed but out there on your own dealing with whatever comes your way.The fundamental problem, which remains, is an overall shortage of HGV drivers in general. Trying to get inactive HGV licence holders back into HGV work does not strike me as a futile gesture at all.
I guess it could depend though - if the limiting factor is number of Ambulances rather than drivers? There could actually be spare drivers in theory (though seems doubtful!)Thanks.
Clearly there is a surfeit of ambulance drivers that we are not aware of...............![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.