MikeInWimbledon
Hardcore MB Enthusiast
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,536
- Car
- (Ex S211 E500, W212 E500, C216, S212 E500, W211 E500 5.5, W221 S500, S211 E500, SL500, S500, E55)
Pardon? What makes you think that that analysis was put out by the Government or that it’s “self-righteous?”Well that's a great message for the government to put out and which ever way you look at it is good news.
But the self righteous tone is bollocks because the comparison with 1879 is false and they know it. The current emissions shown above don't account for emission produced by our imports. We have effectively exported our emissions by have someone else release them on a scale that is nearly double the emissions we are owning up to. This is just one of the reasons why we will never achieve a true net zero.
View attachment 154267
https://archive.ph/8jVY3
Read it again. It’s published by a Carbon reduction pressure group that’s nothing to do with our or any other a government.
It clearly said that last years numbers were due to a mild winter across Europe, the high cost of energy, and imports of (essentially nuclear) energy from France.
Yes it does acknowledge that just 12 years ago Coal power stations produced 40% of Britain’s electricity, but how is the transition to solar and wind “self-righteous?”
We knew all this stuff was happening. We know all the caveats - mild winter, offshoring manufacturing CO2 emissions to Germany, China and India, our endless obsession with increased air travel and so on. A jolly good war in the Middle East, Eastern Europe and a proper winter could reverse all these temporary gains. But the numbers are dramatic, which is why they’re reported.
Last edited: