Darrell
Hardcore MB Enthusiast
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2006
- Messages
- 13,679
- Car
- Gixxer 6, Citroen Berlingo, 911 C4S, Dacia Duster and lots of bicycles.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Surely not an Evo though?£80,000? Jeez......I had one also in yellow....paid £2000 for it needing quite a bit of work....sold it for a bit more!!!!!!!
Nope......a Delta HF Integrale 16v.....very similar car though.Surely not an Evo though?
Buddy of mine has an Evo. He’s probably spent £40,000 on it over the 15 years he’s had it.Nope......a Delta HF Integrale 16v.....very similar car though.
When I bought it, it had a blown engine (they all blow sooner of later!) and needed fair bit of paint. They were just old rusty cars when I bought it through the trade!!
Reading the spec, is it a bit tarted up?How times have changed I personally think its abit rich
It can happen. I have 2002 plate on a vehicle manufactured in 1999. What mine and the Integrale have in common is they are both imports. Mine went to Spain (from USA) when new for three years and then to the UK - which is where the discrepancy likely arose. Why the discrepancy with the Lancia I don't know but possibly the UK wasn't the first country it encountered out of Italy or maybe just a blunder - in its and my registration allocations.I dont understand why they say it is 1992 when it has a "N" reg which says 1994-95?? You cannot put a newer plate on an older car??
kc
I think N is actually 95-96. My old 124 is M-reg and was registered in early 95. (Unless mine has an incorrect plate too!!)I dont understand why they say it is 1992 when it has a "N" reg which says 1994-95?? You cannot put a newer plate on an older car??
kc
There is the possibility that my 1999 came first to the UK from the USA in 1999, was exported for use by the UN in Spain, then reimported to the UK in 2002. If, the original importer had retained ownership for those three years, leasing it to the UN, then I suppose its first sale to the public by a dealer was in 2002. Or, just a blunder.It used to happen all the time.....my friend has an import 1969 Charger.....with 1980 W reg plates!......cars were often giving a plate relating to the date of import rather than of manufacture. Should not have been possible on a 99 though.....unless it was in stock for three yeas before being sold.....then it gets the plate of registration date or course ....not build date. A 1999 built import car should have 99 plate (T Reg) and would have been required to provide proof of age before the DVLA issued a plate and V5C...........either the overseas reg doc or a letter of proof of date of manufacture from an authorised members club or recognised authority.
This^It can happen. I have 2002 plate on a vehicle manufactured in 1999. What mine and the Integrale have in common is they are both imports. Mine went to Spain (from USA) when new for three years and then to the UK - which is where the discrepancy likely arose. Why the discrepancy with the Lancia I don't know but possibly the UK wasn't the first country it encountered out of Italy or maybe just a blunder - in its and my registration allocations.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.