• The Forums are now open to new registrations, adverts are also being de-tuned.

The UK Politics & Brexit Thread

A lot can change in 7 years.

But.

I bet she’ll blame Covid, the world wide recession, Brexit and the war in the Ukraine.
Of course, easy targets even if incorrect and a lot of people will take it as gospel!
 
Funny, that.

Apparently, Angela Rayner said the following in 2017:

'Labour will protect the triple lock on state pensions, maintain the winter fuel allowance and free bus passes for pensioners'.

Not sure we should be laughing or crying :confused:

But nothing about stopping the profiting from the RTB scheme? 🙄
 
Apparently, Angela Rayner said the following in 2017:
'Labour will protect the triple lock on state pensions, maintain the winter fuel allowance and free bus passes for pensioners'.
Not sure we should be laughing or crying :confused:
One down, two to go.

Bus passes gone by Christmas, triple lock by next Summer?
 
The "£22bn black hole" is relevant.





What matters is that they urgently need more money (all Labour governments do - 'austerity' has always been a Tory thing). But they said that they "won't raise taxes".





So they're in a bit of a pickle.
 
I hope in many ways that I am wrong but I can foresee many people in the country will very quickly lose patience with this regime and there will be large scale public unrest.
 
The "£22bn black hole" is relevant.





What matters is that they urgently need more money (all Labour governments do - 'austerity' has always been a Tory thing). But they said that they "won't raise taxes".





So they're in a bit of a pickle.
And they will continue to placate the roles by simply blaming the previous govt.
 
One down, two to go.

Bus passes gone by Christmas, triple lock by next Summer?

I hear from family still in politics that means testing is the ultimate aim. That will save them several £billions initially and possibly several tens of billions as the screw turns each year.

The state pension budget for 2023/24, without checking, is around £125 billion and 80% of pensioners have other income.

Who would object to robbing the rich pensioners to help the poorer ones? As well as send more weapons to Ukraine and provide new Mercs for dictators under the Foreign Aid budget?

Socialism means we're not meant to be equal, we're meant to be equally poor. And someone has got to pay for Miliband's Nut Zero madness.
 
The "£22bn black hole" is relevant.
What matters is that they urgently need more money (all Labour governments do - 'austerity' has always been a Tory thing). But they said that they "won't raise taxes".
So they're in a bit of a pickle.
Not quite. Labour said "No Income tax, no National insurance, no VAT...." because Labour will NOT tax working people.

 
I hear from family still in politics that means testing is the ultimate aim. That will save them several £billions initially and possibly several tens of billions as the screw turns each year.

The state pension budget for 2023/24, without checking, is around £125 billion and 80% of pensioners have other income.

Who would object to robbing the rich pensioners to help the poorer ones?
Define a ‘rich pensioner’
 
Define a ‘rich pensioner’
Retired teacher, nurse, doctor, lawyer, civil servant, railwayman, MP,

and those who've worked for large benevolent corporations, often foreign, all their working lives.
Oh, and IT specialists who were in the right place at the right time.

(OK add those generally who knew that "Jesus saves, but Moses invests")

The self-employed, those whose initial careers slow down after 40, and those with medical issues: not so much.
 
Define a ‘rich pensioner’

That's the problem Starmer faces. I believe the UK state pension is in the bottom half of European pensions.

For example, here in France the pension is over €1500 per month, so €18000 p.a. or £15,400 ... aprox. 50% higher than the UK.
 
That's the problem Starmer faces. I believe the UK state pension is in the bottom half of European pensions.

For example, here in France the pension is over €1500 per month, so €18000 p.a. or £15,400 ... aprox. 50% higher than the UK.
So in the U.K. we don’t have rich pensioners?
 
Retired teacher, nurse, doctor, lawyer, civil servant, railwayman, MP,

and those who've worked for large benevolent corporations, often foreign, all their working lives.
Oh, and IT specialists who were in the right place at the right time.

(OK add those generally who knew that "Jesus saves, but Moses invests")

The self-employed, those whose initial careers slow down after 40, and those with medical issues: not so much.
They’re rich are they or do they just have decent pensions?
 
So in the U.K. we don’t have rich pensioners?

That's a political decision and for Starmer to decide. Some interesting stats below on average or mean incomes in the UK this year. Perhaps he will be guided by them ... or just by sheer dogma?


And perhaps it's worth repeating that Starmer, when DPP, demanded and received his Civil Service pension to be paid tax-free. He is over 60 now, so perhaps already in receipt of it.

What's your idea of a rich pensioner?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom